Continuing on the education series, I would like to break down each problem one by one if necessary. I'll first start with the graduation discrepancy between the sexes. If you want some information on the research as to size of the discrepancy see my previous post Education facts by Gender.
So let's start with some possible reasons as to why we see the graduation discrepancy between the sexes. I'll use a list format to show some possible reasons
1. Education's primary usefulness is job related and men can still find jobs without a high school degree or college degree
2. Males are not motivated to learn.
3. The schooling environment is not suitable for males.
4. Bias
Of the three listed, I think the first may be the most likely culprit. Looking at the broad market of jobs there are still many jobs that don't require a HS diploma or college degree. These jobs are typically male dominated and for many guys don't pay poorly. If we look at the incentives in place to get an education, men as a group, have less incentive then women. As long as a guy can expect to get a job that will pay enough to fill a provider role, they'll have a stronger incentive to forego their schooling. Of course that's the economic outlook on it.
I don't overall,l see points two and three as being overriding factor as to graduation discrepancy. I don't think males are unmotivated to learn, some may be, but in general I think it's more a matter of what they want to learn. Schools are not always able to cover the entire interest set of their students and that could be part of the reason we see some guys leaving as their interests are covered. Of course, issue three is the very heart of the debate for the boy crisis. I think that may be better reserved for another post so I won't comment on that at the moment.
Thoughts?
*Updated to add bias to the list.
4 comments:
Not long ago they made a study in sweden that showed that boys and girls are equally good in the subjects. Standardized tests shows this very clearly.
The conclusion was that the reason boys gets lower grades is that they do not "understand" the school-code. Ie, have a hard time adapting to a female norm of behaviour.
Bias is not among your 3 alternatives, it probably should be.
Might need to add that according to swedish rulse of setting grades, only the konwledgebase of the pupil should be a factor, nothing else.
Bj0rnborg I've updated the list to add bias to it. I'm interested in the study you mentioned, if you can find it that would be great. I'll try to take a look at some of the research there myself.
Apparently I mixed up two studies:
Here is the one about boys and the schoolcode:
http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:174228
A personal reflection of this would be; Are boys not beeing thaught the schoolcode (discrimination) or are boyish behaviour not beeing tolerated in the schoolcode. (discrimination).
Here is a study that shows that even though it has been shown in international studies (PISA) that swedish boys does better in mathematics, natural sciences, chemistry, geography and environmental sciences for instance, swedish girls get higher grades in these subjects.
http://web.telia.com/~u18411153/NycanderSLUTVERSION_2006-11-17.pdf
Pisa (in english)
http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.html
Post a Comment